Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing
  • Home
  • Hot Topics
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Big Law
  • Small Law
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing
No Result
View All Result
Home Small Law

Annoying Lawyers Sometimes Get More For Their Clients

Daily Legal Briefing by Daily Legal Briefing
June 2, 2022
in Small Law
0
March Madness Is A Fun Time At Many Law Firms
4
SHARES
34
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


halloween lawyer

(Image via Getty)

Most of us already know from our legal training that lawyers have an ethical obligation to diligently advocate for their clients. However, many attorneys act with reasonable constraints about the tactics they use to advocate for their clients in order to preserve their reputations and possibly because long-term relationships with adversaries can assist clients over time. Nevertheless, lawyers sometimes employ annoying tactics either because of their personalities or because they are simply doing their jobs trying to advocate for their clients. Even though such tactics can make attorneys difficult for adversaries to deal with, they can often lead to better results for clients, at least in the short term.

After I left Biglaw and began practicing as a “street lawyer” who actually went to court and took depositions, I realized how important relationships with adversaries were to a representation. Adversaries usually have a say about a number of courtesies, such as extensions, accepting service over email, and other matters. Moreover, having a good relationship with adversaries can help lawyers resolve matters and obtain favorable settlements for clients. As a result, it may make sense not to be needlessly annoying to adversaries so that all of these benefits of long-term connections can be realized. However, I have seen time and time again in my career how annoying lawyers can sometimes obtain short-term advantages for clients.

For instance, one time, I heard about a deposition in a mass torts case where one of the attorneys who was representing a defendant at the deposition was well known for being somewhat annoying in his tactics and for staying at the periphery of the social circle of lawyers who practice in this area of the law. I can attest to these facts since I practiced in this mass torts circuit and had firsthand experience with this lawyer.

At the deposition, the lawyer objected to pretty much every question the plaintiff’s attorney asked her client (in this mass torts case, it was common for plaintiff’s lawyers to ask questions of their clients at depositions, I know this is somewhat uncommon in other contexts). In any event, the objections were mostly pointless since the jurisdiction in which we practice preserves all objections for trial except for objections as to form, and this lawyer was objecting for all types of reasons. The plaintiff’s lawyer got so frustrated with this attorney that she agreed to stipulate this lawyer’s client out of the case then and there to avoid the meaningless objections being made by that attorney. Now granted, I was not at this deposition myself, but it was totally the type of thing that could happen in those cases, and being annoying helped that lawyer get a significant advantage for his client.

At another time in my career, I represented a corporate client that had a representative who was going through some health issues. It was pretty clear that the potential deponent was too sick to provide reliable information, and that a deposition would be harmful to her health. Even though we got proof that this was the case, my adversary insisted that this deponent be produced for a deposition. We offered to proceed by written questions, provide any other discovery my adversary wished, and other compromises, but the adversary would not budge. To my adversary’s credit, he stated that as a human, he agreed with me that this person probably should not be produced for a deposition, but as a lawyer, he needed to be annoying to get every advantage he could for his client. Especially since he made it clear that this annoying tactic was part of diligent representation, I did not hold it too much against my adversary that he was taking the position he was.

In any event, this annoying tactic created an immense amount of stress and uncertainty with my client. My client definitely considered settling the case instead of possibly needing to produce a witness for a deposition that could be harmful to this person’s health. I of course do not condone sticking to litigation tactics that could cause a bona fide health issue, and if I was in my adversary’s shoes, I might not have insisted as much that a witness be deposed even though a deposition could cause health issues. However, employing this annoying tactic did have some short-term benefits for the adversary’s clients, even though it may have frayed relationships over the long term.

I am sure that every lawyer has a story of somewhat-annoying adversaries employing annoying tactics and getting unpredictable results, and if you have stories of your own, please reach out to me, I’d love to hear them. Again, employing annoying tactics can harm long-term relationships between adversaries and may not be good practice in many contexts. But somewhat unfortunately, attorneys can obtain short-term benefits for clients by employing annoying tactics that some attorneys may not feel comfortable using.


Jordan Rothman is a partner of The Rothman Law Firm, a full-service New York and New Jersey law firm. He is also the founder of Student Debt Diaries, a website discussing how he paid off his student loans. You can reach Jordan through email at jordan@rothman.law.



Click to Read Original Article

Previous Post

Practising Law Institute Continuing Legal Education Programs, Webcasts and Publications

Next Post

The Best Reason To Pick A Biglaw Firm

Daily Legal Briefing

Daily Legal Briefing

The latest breaking legal news from across World all in one place.

Related Posts

How To Write The Best Blog Post Titles
Small Law

Your Website’s Choice Of Color Matters

by Daily Legal Briefing
March 18, 2023
Protecting Client Trust Accounts When Banks Collapse
Small Law

Protecting Client Trust Accounts When Banks Collapse

by Daily Legal Briefing
March 17, 2023
The U.S. Cities Where Biglaw Associates Are The Most Satisfied (2022)
Small Law

‘Way Overdue’ Or ‘Complete Waste Of Time’? What ATL Readers Think Of The Return To In-Person Events

by Daily Legal Briefing
March 16, 2023
Starting a Law Firm: Streamline the Client Lifecycle
Small Law

Starting a Law Firm: Streamline the Client Lifecycle

by Daily Legal Briefing
March 16, 2023
I Like Having Clients And Counterparts In Different Time Zones
Small Law

I Like Having Clients And Counterparts In Different Time Zones

by Daily Legal Briefing
March 16, 2023
Next Post
The Best Reason To Pick A Biglaw Firm

The Best Reason To Pick A Biglaw Firm

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Premium Content

How Blockchain and Crypto Influence the Film Industry

E-conveyancing: The future of property transactions in Property Law?

July 2, 2022
3 Ways US Immigration Laws Can Help During Ukrainian Crisis

The Triple Whammy Of Delays Affecting International Travel For New U.S. Citizens

September 7, 2022
Priori Legal, Marketplace for In-House Legal Teams, Raises $15M to Fuel Growth and Meet Demand

Priori Legal, Marketplace for In-House Legal Teams, Raises $15M to Fuel Growth and Meet Demand

July 21, 2022

Browse by Category

  • Big Law
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Hot Topics
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
  • Small Law

About US

Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing.
Online coverage of breaking legal news and current law headlines from around the US. Top stories, videos, insight, and in-depth analysis.

Categories

  • Big Law
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Hot Topics
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
  • Small Law

Recent Updates

  • Cloud Computing Can Give Your Business a Much-Needed Boost
  • Top Reasons for Shippers to Consider Intermodal Transportation
  • Your Website’s Choice Of Color Matters

© 2021 Daily Legal Briefing | Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines

No Result
View All Result
  • Contact Us
  • Home

© 2021 Daily Legal Briefing | Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?