Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing
  • Home
  • Hot Topics
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Big Law
  • Small Law
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing
No Result
View All Result
Home Small Law

Attorney Sued For ‘Quiet Quitting’ Her Law Firm Job Now Seeks Sanctions

Daily Legal Briefing by Daily Legal Briefing
March 9, 2023
in Small Law
0
Attorney Sued For ‘Quiet Quitting’ Her Law Firm Job
4
SHARES
32
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


Quiet quitting symbol. Concept words Quiet quitting on wooden blocks. Beautiful background from dollar bills. Business and quiet quitting concept. Copy space.The messy legal back-and-forth between the law firm Napoli Shkolnik and their former employee, Heather Palmore, began two weeks ago when they sued Palmore in New York state court alleging she “quiet quit” her job and was surreptitiously working two jobs remotely (at Napoli Shkolnik and her own firm). The firm’s complaint also alleged Palmore attempted “to extort money from the firm by making false and defamatory claims of discrimination directed to ‘others’ without any factual basis.” Then Palmore fired back, filing a federal complaint fleshing out those allegations of racial and disability discrimination and alleging the firm’s lawsuit was retaliatory and designed to preempt the discrimination lawsuit.

Now, in advance of a motion to dismiss — which the current filing promises is coming — Palmore has filed a motion to quash the non-party subpoenas already served in the action and/or issue a protective order in the state action. Oh, and they’re seeking sanctions as well. The filing characterizes the state action as a problematic use of the court system, “This entire action is an abusive use of the judiciary intended to harass and defame Ms. Palmore for asserting claims of discrimination and retaliation against Napoli Shkolnik.” And continues to paint the federal action filed by Palmore as the only appropriate action:

The Palmore Action is the only legitimate dispute between these parties—this action is a farce. Not only are the claims in this action easily proven to be built on lies and even as alleged unsustainable on the law, but the lawsuit was filed only after Napoli Shkolnik begged Ms. Palmore not to file her own lawsuit so that the parties could engage in mediation, only for Napoli Shkolnik to use that time to cobble together a fraudulent complaint to preemptively file against her—and then seek press on its filing to impugn her reputation. For that reason, this action is referred to as the “Napoli Preemptive Action.”

This serves as the basis for Palmore’s motion to quash those non-party subpoenas to her other former employers:

However, the vindictiveness of this action—if not already wholly apparent on its face—is already further bolstered by the fact that Napoli Shkolnik’s served four non-party subpoenas on Ms. Palmore’s former employers only four days after this action was filed and before it was even served on Ms. Palmore (the “Former Employer Subpoenas”). Napoli Shkolnik did not even give Ms. Palmore notice of the subpoenas before service to give her an opportunity to file this motion before commencing the disruptive act of serving subpoenas on people in her professional network. The Former Employer Subpoenas are completely intrusive and seek a broad array of documents that have absolutely no bearing on this litigation and are naked attempts to further tarnish Ms. Palmore’s professional standing and reputation.

The filing characterizes the no-notice subpoenas of former employers as harassing and, they argue, disfavored under New York law. As such, that forms the basis for the request for sanctions, arguing, “the Court should respectfully find that the issuance of the Former Employer Subpoenas was intended to ‘harass or maliciously injure’ Ms. Palmore. Respectfully, Napoli Shkolnik’s conduct must be deterred in the strongest possible terms, and the mere granting of this motion and quashing of the Former Employer Subpoenas will be insufficient under these circumstances.”

When reached for comment, Lucas Markowitz of Offit Kurman, attorney for Napoli Shkolnik, said:

As Ms. Palmore seeks media appearance after media appearance, the firm is focused on getting to the truth. Even at this early stage, Ms. Palmore’s attorneys are attempting to block her former employers from providing information about her work history and qualifications, and Ms. Palmore is deleting her own Facebook posts about the case. She doesn’t want the truth to get out.

You can read the full motion below.

Motion to Quash Subpoenas


Kathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, host of The Jabot podcast, and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter @Kathryn1 or Mastodon @Kathryn1@mastodon.social.





Click to Read Original Article

Previous Post

Do You Have to Pay Your Salaried Employees Overtime in Oklahoma?

Next Post

More Law Firms Should Schedule Happy Hours For Attorneys And Staff

Daily Legal Briefing

Daily Legal Briefing

The latest breaking legal news from across World all in one place.

Related Posts

How To Write The Best Blog Post Titles
Small Law

Digital Marketing Agency Horror Stories

by Daily Legal Briefing
April 1, 2023
People Love To Threaten Bankruptcy During Litigation
Small Law

People Love To Threaten Bankruptcy During Litigation

by Daily Legal Briefing
March 31, 2023
Disability and Legal Tech Design
Small Law

Disability and Legal Tech Design

by Daily Legal Briefing
March 31, 2023
Managing Remote And Hybrid Teams
Small Law

Why Legal Ops Is Critical During Times Of Economic Uncertainty

by Daily Legal Briefing
March 30, 2023
Someday Notions And Birthday Dreams: Lessons From A Lawyer Mom’s Quest To Write A Book
Small Law

Someday Notions And Birthday Dreams: Lessons From A Lawyer Mom’s Quest To Write A Book

by Daily Legal Briefing
March 30, 2023
Next Post
More Law Firms Should Schedule Happy Hours For Attorneys And Staff

More Law Firms Should Schedule Happy Hours For Attorneys And Staff

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Premium Content

The Commonwealth – An Engine For Legal Innovation?

The Commonwealth – An Engine For Legal Innovation?

June 27, 2022
From Chasing Paper To Chasing Business 

From Chasing Paper To Chasing Business 

November 3, 2022
How To Protect Yourself From The Attack Of Spam Email Bot-Recruiters

How To Protect Yourself From The Attack Of Spam Email Bot-Recruiters

August 16, 2022

Browse by Category

  • Big Law
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Hot Topics
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
  • Small Law

About US

Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing.
Online coverage of breaking legal news and current law headlines from around the US. Top stories, videos, insight, and in-depth analysis.

Categories

  • Big Law
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Hot Topics
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
  • Small Law

Recent Updates

  • Digital Marketing Agency Horror Stories
  • New York’s Biglaw Firms Really Flopped Financially Last Year
  • The Legal and Ethical Implications of Workplace Vaccine Mandates

© 2021 Daily Legal Briefing | Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines

No Result
View All Result
  • Contact Us
  • Home

© 2021 Daily Legal Briefing | Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?