Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing
  • Home
  • Hot Topics
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Big Law
  • Small Law
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing
No Result
View All Result
Home Law School

Chasing Amy (Wax) – Above the LawAbove the Law

Daily Legal Briefing by Daily Legal Briefing
January 25, 2022
in Law School
0
Dean Calls Amy Wax’s Remarks ‘Xenophobic And White Supremacist,’ Passes World’s Easiest Issue-Spotter
4
SHARES
32
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


Amy Wax

Amy Wax

Professor Amy Wax was at it yet again with a problematic take.

And the Academy rallied! Why, there simply must be academic freedom to speak such thoughts. Even if they aren’t academic. If we don’t tolerate these completely unacademic ponderings, you’ll be next. Joe Patrice did a nice job of knocking down those pins. But I’m curious why the most vigorous defense of academic freedom always comes in the name of someone like Amy Wax. I don’t think it’s a coincidence.

I wonder if the problem is how we define academic freedom. The basis of academic freedom is intellectual pursuits. Flat-out racism and eugenics are not intellectual pursuits. And we forget often that academic freedom not only applies to the faculty but to the students as well. As the Supreme Court pointed out in Keyishian v. Board of Regents of the State Univ. of New York, 385 U.S. 589 (1967): “The nation’s future depends upon leaders trained through wide exposure to that robust exchange of ideas which discovers truth ‘out of a multitude of tongues [rather] than through any kind of authoritative selection.” Thus, not only are professors and students enriched via a free exchange of ideas, but society as a whole is better off.

Yet we cling to academic freedom to mean we can say any stupid anti-intellectual thing. Conservative law profs argue that we must preserve Amy Wax’s anti-intellectual position in the name of academic freedom. I’ve already written about Amy Wax and how her position is not academic. This column really isn’t about her.

It’s about the subtle and not-so-subtle racism that plays out because law professors are out defending the most flagrant examples. It provides shelter and cover for other less overt but still egregious forms of racism. And those, too, hamper academic freedom.

I expect the Amy Wax defense from the conservative side of academia. The Amy Wax fetishism is strong and takes up a LOT of their spare blogging time and space. My beef here is with the “liberal” law professors who are quick to condemn Amy Wax yet equally quick to adopt some of her same beliefs, however subtly.

I tweeted, “Let’s suppose a flagrant racist is on a law school faculty hiring committee. Let’s suppose further the prof in question is sufficiently smart in their racism to know not to just exclude minorities based upon minority status. What proxies would that racist use?” It was amusing that people were asking which law schools had racists on the faculty. Hint: All of them, to varying degrees.

But my point in crafting this tweet wasn’t to state that there’s racism in every law school (although there is). It was to state that one doesn’t have to be Amy Wax to engage in types of beliefs that are quite similar to Amy Wax. 

For example, we could discuss whether using law school alma mater as a prime mover for a school’s hiring practices is problematic. We could discuss whether using Supreme Court clerkships would yield the same result. You see, you don’t have to be Amy Wax to promote outcomes that closely follow her belief system.  All you have to do is continue to promote a system that already disadvantages some groups and celebrate it as a meritocracy.

And law schools are doing just that.

Schools LOVE to pretend they are doing their liberal best. As Professors Carliss Chatman and Najarian Peters brilliantly point out, it is quite easy to make it LOOK like you’re woke and liberal and caring about diversity. We’re not Amy Wax. Hey, we’re TRYING. We have a TRULY AMAZING minority candidate.

Really? Just one?

Amy Wax, as I stated in a tweet, is a sideshow. And treating her like an aberration ignores a larger problem in the legal academy and provides cover for a host of racial sins. As student bodies grow more diverse, law school faculty profiles are just so damn slow to catch up.

Again, Chatman and Peters: “Legal academic hiring follows a script that is steeped in racist practices, because the legal academy is one of the last safe spaces for white supremacist ideas to flow freely under the cover of academic freedom and distorted First Amendment arguments. Around and around the tables of faculty meetings, heads nod in agreement to the delivery of a homily of regret, confounded but nonetheless resigned to the poised self-reverence that gives the straight-faced and well-meaning faculty the spine to say unspeakable things about how much they tried. They tried.”

Maybe they did try. Maybe they didn’t.

Because if all these institutions are trying, why are so many failing?  Incompetence may be an answer. But systemic incompetence suggests something far more nefarious. As Professor Meera Deo’s book points out, it doesn’t seem like an accident: “Recent AALS statistics show that 62% of law professors are men and at least 71% are white; though faculty diversity is low now, it was even lower in past decades.” And the bulk of those faculty hail from a few elite schools. So it seems that the fetishism of law schools is Ivy, not diversity.

Thus, the focus on the Amy Wax Sideshow hides more problematic points. Her notion of eugenics may receive full-throated contempt from a legal academy that uses hiring signals that promote outcomes that aren’t far off from the anti-intellectual crap Amy Wax is spouting. Whether you think Amy Wax ought to be fired or not, her views are merely spoken extremes of a much more unspoken problem in a not-so-liberal legal academia.

Maybe, just maybe, we should focus on those problems.


LawProfBlawg is an anonymous professor at a top 100 law school. You can see more of his musings here. He is way funnier on social media, he claims. Please follow him on Twitter (@lawprofblawg). Email him at lawprofblawg@gmail.com.





Click to Read Original Article

Previous Post

6 Strategies for Improving Your Legal Process in Oregon

Next Post

Judge is censured for tiff over his reserved parking spot; a cane was thrown

Daily Legal Briefing

Daily Legal Briefing

Related Posts

Rating Jonathan Turley’s Wildest, Thirstiest, Most Embarrassing Bids For Attention In 2022
Law School

Jonathan Turley Rewrites Constitution To Include ‘Congressional Backsies’ Clause

by Daily Legal Briefing
June 3, 2023
Weird How Quiet The ‘Campus Free Speech Crisis’ Crowd Has Been About CUNY Law School
Law School

Weird How Quiet The ‘Campus Free Speech Crisis’ Crowd Has Been About CUNY Law School

by Daily Legal Briefing
June 3, 2023
Jonathan Turley Earns Withering Rebuke From Preet Bharara
Law School

Jonathan Turley Has New Theory To Bust Hunter Biden And All It Requires Is Warping The Fabric Of Space-Time

by Daily Legal Briefing
June 1, 2023
Want More Lawyer Diversity? Sure, Axe The LSAT, But The Real Problem Is Inside The Profession
Law School

GRE Building A Better Test… But Is It Still A Good Test For Law Schools?

by Daily Legal Briefing
June 1, 2023
The Black Guide To Law School Rankings Are Out… With A Twist
Law School

The Black Guide To Law School Rankings Are Out… With A Twist

by Daily Legal Briefing
May 31, 2023
Next Post
Judge who searched litigant’s home for marital property gets censure and fine

Judge is censured for tiff over his reserved parking spot; a cane was thrown

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Premium Content

Litera Names Winners of The Changing Lawyer Awards, Including Innovator of Year, Law Firm of Year, Disruptor of Year, and Lifetime Achievement

Litera Names Winners of The Changing Lawyer Awards, Including Innovator of Year, Law Firm of Year, Disruptor of Year, and Lifetime Achievement

November 25, 2021
Top 50 Biglaw Firm Rewards Its Hardest Workers With Special Bonus Money

Big Raises Ahead For This Biglaw Firm

February 28, 2022
The Benefits From A Small Business Credit Card

The Benefits From A Small Business Credit Card

June 17, 2022

Browse by Category

  • Big Law
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Hot Topics
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
  • Small Law

About US

Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing.
Online coverage of breaking legal news and current law headlines from around the US. Top stories, videos, insight, and in-depth analysis.

Categories

  • Big Law
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Hot Topics
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
  • Small Law

Recent Updates

  • Clients Should Try Not To Contact Lawyers During Odd Hours
  • Jonathan Turley Rewrites Constitution To Include ‘Congressional Backsies’ Clause
  • The Biglaw Firm With The Largest Decline In Gross Revenue

© 2021 Daily Legal Briefing | Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines

No Result
View All Result
  • Contact Us
  • Home

© 2021 Daily Legal Briefing | Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?