Asked and Answered
Do federal jurors still care whether a witness is caught in a lie? Not as much, say 2 veteran litigators
Image from Shutterstock.
If you have a trial coming up in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, it’s likely that jurors will be spread out across the courtroom and masked, rather sitting in the box.
And your litigation team has to tune in remotely because the team members can’t join you at the counsel table, says Ronald Safer, a Chicago lawyer who has tried two federal cases in the past six months.
The physical aspects aren’t the only changes in federal litigation, according to Safer, who shared his observations, along with fellow Chicago trial lawyer James Sotos. They think jurors, particularly those younger than age 40, are much more forgiving whether a witness is caught lying, few care whether a party admits to drug use, and many expect significant documentation from law enforcement trying to defend misconduct charges.
Both are featured in this month’s Asked and Answered podcast, which is looking at how litigation has changed over the years.
Send ideas for future episodes to ABA Journal Senior Writer Stephanie Francis Ward.
Want to listen on the go? Asked and Answered is available on several podcast listening services. Subscribe and never miss an episode.
Apple | Spotify | Google Play
This podcast was brought to you by our advertiser, LawPay. “Did you know that attorneys who accept online payments get paid 39 percent faster on average than those using traditional payment methods? With LawPay, the only payment solution offered through the ABA Advantage program, you can accept client payments online, via email, or in person—no equipment needed. Visit LawPay.com/podcast to sign up and get your first three months free. Trust the #1 payment solution for the legal industry—LawPay.”
In This Podcast:
Ronald Safer is a name partner at Riley Safer Holmes & Cancila in Chicago. He previously chaired the criminal division of the Chicago U.S. attorney’s office and now does civil and white-collar defense work.
James Sotos of the Sotos Law Firm defends municipalities on civil rights claims. He also provides defense for law enforcement accused of misdeeds and has argued two U.S. Supreme Court cases.