Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing
  • Home
  • Hot Topics
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Big Law
  • Small Law
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing
No Result
View All Result
Home Hot Topics

Driver injured in collision with fortified mailbox can’t sue owners, top Ohio court says

Daily Legal Briefing by Daily Legal Briefing
December 1, 2021
in Hot Topics
0
Driver injured in collision with fortified mailbox can’t sue owners, top Ohio court says
4
SHARES
34
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


  1. Home
  2. Daily News
  3. Driver injured in collision with fortified…

Tort Law

Driver injured in collision with fortified mailbox can’t sue owners, top Ohio court says

By Debra Cassens Weiss

November 30, 2021, 11:27 am CST

Adjacent landowners owe no duty of care to a driver whose pickup truck hit a patch of black ice, veered off the road and hit their fortified mailbox in the right of way, the Ohio Supreme Court has ruled in a 5-2 decision.

The state supreme court found no liability in the lawsuit by driver Cletus Snay, who was a quadriplegic as a result of the December 2016 accident, Court New Ohio reports. The Nov. 24 opinion is here.

The driver had argued that a landowner owes a duty of care to drivers who strike a hazard in the right of way if the landowner consciously created the hazard with knowledge of the possible danger to motorists who leave the road.

Landowner Matthew Burr had obtained guidelines for mailbox installation from his local post office but did not follow the recommendation for a 2-inch-diameter mailbox support made of standard steel or aluminum pipe. The recommendation said the pipe should be buried no more than 24 inches deep.

Burr used an 8-inch-diameter metal pipe and buried it 36 inches deep in a hole filled with old powdered concrete mix and stones. He had hoped that the construction would deter vandals but was “fairly confident” that it would not hold if struck.

He did testify, however, that he thought that, if it rained and the concrete mix was still good, it “might set up” and hold the support in place “a little stiffer.”

The pipe did not budge during the accident on Young Road between Norwalk, Ohio, and Bellevue, Ohio, although a second mailbox was destroyed.

Snay and Kelly Snay sued landowners Burr and Diane Burr for Snay’s injuries and Kelly Snay’s loss of consortium. A trial judge granted the Burrs’ motion for summary judgment, finding that Ohio law does not impose a duty of care on landowners to motorists who lose control of their vehicles and strike an object in the right of way.

An appeals court agreed and also found that the Burrs’ conduct was not a proximate cause of the Snays’ injuries.

The truck driver had cited the second Restatement of the Law regarding torts. It states that possessors of land are liable when they create or permit an artificial condition near a highway, and they realize or should realize that it creates an unreasonable risk to those who travel on the highway with reasonable care and “foreseeably deviate from it in the ordinary course of travel.”

The Ohio Supreme Court said it has not adopted the Restatement of the Law section and would not do so in this case, partly because it wouldn’t impose a duty on the Burrs. That is because the mailbox did not affect ordinary travel on the regularly traveled portion of the road, the state supreme court said.

“To the contrary,” the Ohio Supreme Court said, ”Snay testified that he had traveled on Young Road without incident and without leaving the regularly traveled portion of the road on his route to and from work for five years. A vehicle traveling ordinarily and with due care on the road would not come in contact with the Burrs’ mailbox. … “The motorist is responsible for keeping his vehicle under control and on the appropriate side of the road, regardless of weather conditions.”

Two justices dissented.

“It is quite clear that Burr did not build an ordinary mailbox: He consciously constructed a mini fortress,” the dissent said. “The intentional construction of an immovable object in the right of way raises an issue of foreseeability. For this reason alone, summary judgment was improper.”





Click to Read Original Article

Previous Post

Comment period on Biden’s workplace vaccine rule extended 45 days

Next Post

Is The Law School Pandemic Boom Finally Over?

Daily Legal Briefing

Daily Legal Briefing

Related Posts

Judge imposes default judgment against former Littler Mendelson client for ‘subversive approach to discovery’
Hot Topics

5th Circuit tells lawyer it is ‘often advisable to read the court’s orders,’ upholds $1,250 sanction

by Daily Legal Briefing
April 12, 2022
Law firm’s managing partner had a ‘fixation’ with employee surveillance, wiretap suit says
Hot Topics

Law firm’s managing partner had a ‘fixation’ with employee surveillance, wiretap suit says

by Daily Legal Briefing
April 12, 2022
Law school applicants are down, for now, for the first time since 2018
Hot Topics

Following a boost in 2021, national average score for February 2022 MBE drops

by Daily Legal Briefing
April 12, 2022
Google violated its ‘don’t be evil’ code when it fired 3 outspoken employees abiding by mandate, suit says
Hot Topics

Google’s ‘privileged’ email labeling, said to prevent lawsuit disclosure, was ‘eyebrow raising,’ judge says

by Daily Legal Briefing
April 11, 2022
New law allows this state’s judges to personally solicit campaign donations; ethics opinion adds wrinkle
Hot Topics

New law allows this state’s judges to personally solicit campaign donations; ethics opinion adds wrinkle

by Daily Legal Briefing
April 11, 2022
Next Post
Is The Law School Pandemic Boom Finally Over?

Is The Law School Pandemic Boom Finally Over?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Premium Content

Former CISA head warns of rivals’ ‘destructive’ cyber capabilities – Breaking Defense Breaking Defense

Former CISA head warns of rivals’ ‘destructive’ cyber capabilities – Breaking Defense Breaking Defense

November 24, 2021
Attorney Burnout Is At An All-Time High

Looks Like A Whole Bunch Of People Will Be Left Out Of The D.C. Bar Exam

May 10, 2022
Harvard Law Review Elects Its First Latina President

Harvard Law Review Editors Go On To Do Some Great Things

September 10, 2022

Browse by Category

  • Big Law
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Hot Topics
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
  • Small Law

About US

Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing.
Online coverage of breaking legal news and current law headlines from around the US. Top stories, videos, insight, and in-depth analysis.

Categories

  • Big Law
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Hot Topics
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
  • Small Law

Recent Updates

  • Law Student Arrested For Beheading Fiancée
  • Introducing ‘UpLevel View’: A Podcast On All Things Legal Ops! 
  • Fried Frank’s Chair Steps Down After 10 Years, Ushering In New Leaders

© 2021 Daily Legal Briefing | Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines

No Result
View All Result
  • Contact Us
  • Home

© 2021 Daily Legal Briefing | Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?