Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing
  • Home
  • Hot Topics
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Big Law
  • Small Law
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing
No Result
View All Result
Home Breaking

Employees of contractors not owed notice of layoffs – 4th Circ.

Daily Legal Briefing by Daily Legal Briefing
December 1, 2021
in Breaking
0
Employees of contractors not owed notice of layoffs – 4th Circ.
4
SHARES
32
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


  • Summary
  • Law firms
  • Related documents

  • Federal WARN Act doesn’t require notice for contractors’ employees, court says
  • 4,000 workers lost jobs after nuclear plant closing
  • Business groups said case could impact COVID-19 litigation

The company and law firm names shown above are generated automatically based on the text of the article. We are improving this feature as we continue to test and develop in beta. We welcome feedback, which you can provide using the feedback tab on the right of the page.

(Reuters) – A U.S. appeals court on Tuesday said a company that shut down construction on a nuclear power plant was not obligated to provide advanced notice that its contractors’ 4,000 employees would be losing their jobs.

The decision by a unanimous three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals may hold broader relevance for contract workers affected by large-scale COVID-19 era layoffs.

The court said South Carolina utility SCANA Corp was not the workers’ employer under the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act because SCANA did not control the contractors that employed them.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to reuters.com

Ruling otherwise would improperly stretch the law, which requires at least 60 days notice of mass layoffs, and would “subject plant owners to the prospect of uncertain and ill-defined liability,” the court said.

SCANA was backed by trade groups including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which said in an amicus brief that a broad application of WARN Act liability could have a devastating impact on businesses involved in pending litigation over pandemic-related layoffs.

The plaintiffs’ lawyers at Raisner Roupinian and Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Nor did Dominion Energy Inc, which acquired SCANA in 2019. SCANA is represented by Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart.

SCANA in 2017 abruptly ceased construction at the South Carolina facility, after exceeding its budget, forcing contractors Fluor Corp and Westinghouse Electric Corp to immediately lay off about 4,000 people.

A group of Fluor workers sued the company and SCANA that year, claiming they had not been given proper WARN Act notice.

SCANA argued that because it did not employ the Fluor workers, it could not be held liable. Fluor maintained that SCANA’s abrupt cancellation of the project was an “unforeseen business circumstance” that exempted it from WARN Act notice requirements.

U.S. District Judge J. Michelle Childs in January granted summary judgment to the companies.

The 4th Circuit panel on Tuesday affirmed, saying SCANA had no ownership interest in Fluor and Westinghouse, had not integrated its personnel policies with those of the contractors and did not control the other companies or their workers.

“The scope of [WARN Act] liability is clear, since it extends precisely to a company’s own employees, so businesses need not make difficult judgment calls as to which unaffiliated firms are likely to have employees affected in some way by a plant closure,” Circuit Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson wrote.

The panel also included Circuit Judges Paul Niemeyer and Diana Motz.

The case is Pennington v. Fluor Corp, 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 21-1141.

For the plaintiffs: Jack Raisner of Raisner Roupinian; and Charles Ercole of Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg

For Fluor: Hagood Tighe of Fisher Phillips

For SCANA: Ted Speth of Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart

Register now for FREE unlimited access to reuters.com

Daniel Wiessner

Dan Wiessner (@danwiessner) reports on labor and employment and immigration law, including litigation and policy making. He can be reached at daniel.wiessner@thomsonreuters.com.



Click to Read Original Article

Previous Post

Jurors rule against associate who sued King & Spalding for alleged ethical retaliation

Next Post

How the original stacks up to the spinoff, part 2

Daily Legal Briefing

Daily Legal Briefing

Related Posts

More U.S. colleges turn to law schools to find their next president
Breaking

More U.S. colleges turn to law schools to find their next president

by Daily Legal Briefing
December 8, 2021
NLRB considering overhaul of test for approving smaller unions
Breaking

NLRB considering overhaul of test for approving smaller unions

by Daily Legal Briefing
December 8, 2021
Cravath plays bonus catch-up as larger law firm payouts spread
Breaking

Cravath plays bonus catch-up as larger law firm payouts spread

by Daily Legal Briefing
December 8, 2021
Mass tort TV ads in serious slump as pandemic drags on
Breaking

Mass tort TV ads in serious slump as pandemic drags on

by Daily Legal Briefing
December 8, 2021
Prosecutors call ex-boyfriend of Ghislaine Maxwell accuser to testify at trial
Breaking

Prosecutors call ex-boyfriend of Ghislaine Maxwell accuser to testify at trial

by Daily Legal Briefing
December 8, 2021
Next Post
How the original stacks up to the spinoff, part 2

How the original stacks up to the spinoff, part 2

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Premium Content

Taking The Bar Exam? Don’t Worry, This Disastrous SCOTUS Term Won’t Be Tested.

Taking The Bar Exam? Don’t Worry, This Disastrous SCOTUS Term Won’t Be Tested.

June 30, 2022
Biglaw Firm Wows With Bonuses Up To $172,500 – If You Bill Enough

Biglaw Firm Wows With Bonuses Up To $172,500 – If You Bill Enough

December 16, 2022
Biden nominates Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to the US Supreme Court

Biden nominates Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to the US Supreme Court

February 26, 2022

Browse by Category

  • Big Law
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Hot Topics
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
  • Small Law

About US

Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing.
Online coverage of breaking legal news and current law headlines from around the US. Top stories, videos, insight, and in-depth analysis.

Categories

  • Big Law
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Hot Topics
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
  • Small Law

Recent Updates

  • Bar Exam Prep Company Goes Down For The Day… Please Don’t Panic
  • From The Bench To Biglaw: Judge Paul Watford Lands At Top 50 Am Law Firm
  • ‘Do Your Research,’ ‘Stick It Out,’ And Other Things Law Schools Should Stop Telling Students About Clerkships

© 2021 Daily Legal Briefing | Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines

No Result
View All Result
  • Contact Us
  • Home

© 2021 Daily Legal Briefing | Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?