Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing
  • Home
  • Hot Topics
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Big Law
  • Small Law
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing
No Result
View All Result
Home Hot Topics

Federal Judge Orders Trump Admin. to Release Names of ‘Anti-Weaponization’ Fund Architects

Daily Legal Briefing by Daily Legal Briefing
September 7, 2026
in Hot Topics
0
Federal Judge Orders Trump Admin. to Release Names of ‘Anti-Weaponization’ Fund Architects
4
SHARES
33
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


“Today’s order granting discovery is a significant step up in getting to the bottom of the slush fund,” said Aman George, senior counsel at Democracy Forward, the nonprofit representing the plaintiffs. “We will continue to meet the government in court until our investigation is complete and the slush fund is permanently halted.”


A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to release the names of the people who came up with the structure for a $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund that Attorney General Todd Blanche now claims is “dead.”

According to NBC News, U.S. Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis of the Eastern District of Virginia issued an order on Friday that granted part of a motion from plaintiffs to force the federal government into discovery. Part of Davis’s order instructs the administration to disclose the names of the fund’s chief architects.

“Today’s order granting discovery is a significant step up in getting to the bottom of the slush fund,” said Aman George, senior counsel at Democracy Forward, the nonprofit representing the plaintiffs. “We will continue to meet the government in court until our investigation is complete and the slush fund is permanently halted.”

NBC News notes that the controversial “anti-weaponization” fund was established as part of a settlement-agreement between President Donald Trump, his family members, the Trump organization, and the Internal Revenue Service. The fund would set aside approximately $1.8 billion in taxpayer funds to compensate persons who “suffered weaponization and lawfare” under past presidential administrations. If approved, the fund would likely extend payments to January 6 rioters who were convicted of violent crimes before being pardoned by Trump.

People milling around in front of the Capitol building, some carrying signs.
January 6, 2021 storming of the United States Capitol. Photo by Tyler Merbler, courtesy of Wikimedia Commons. CC BY 2.0

Remarkably, the agreement contained another provision shielding Trump and several of his relatives from future IRS audits.

Attorney General Blanche later wrote that the fund “is rescinded” and that there currently “is no fund.” However, the document signed by Blanche wasn’t approved by the fund’s other signatories—meaning that the fund, and the audit provisions, could be brought back at a later date. Despite Blanche’s insistence, President Trump has taken a different stance on the matter, repeatedly voicing his support for a fund that would compensate his supporters and political allies. Earlier this summer, during a cabinet meeting, Trump lamented that the fund “is dead, but you know, I wish it weren’t,” emphasizing that he thinks “people were horribly treated.”

The New York Times reports that, earlier this year, another Florida-based federal judge “excoriated” Trump’s original lawsuit against the IRS, who observed that Trump was, in effect, suing an agency that he controls.

Sources

Judge orders Trump officials to disclose who set up the $1.8B ‘anti-weaponization’ fund

Judge Orders Trump Officials to Divulge Names of Those Who Set Up $1.8 Billion Fund



Click to Read Original Article

Previous Post

UW Professor Settles Lawsuit Over Parody Land Acknowledgment

Next Post

Bigger Is Better In Biglaw

Daily Legal Briefing

Daily Legal Briefing

The latest breaking legal news from across World all in one place.

Related Posts

Elder Abuse and When It’s Time to Call an Attorney
Hot Topics

Elder Abuse and When It’s Time to Call an Attorney

by Daily Legal Briefing
October 16, 2026
When “Open to the Public” Doesn’t Mean Safe
Hot Topics

When “Open to the Public” Doesn’t Mean Safe

by Daily Legal Briefing
October 16, 2026
Federal Court Rules Case Alleging Systemic Discrimination by New York Courts Against Blind Jurors in Grand Jury System Can Proceed
Hot Topics

Federal Court Rules Case Alleging Systemic Discrimination by New York Courts Against Blind Jurors in Grand Jury System Can Proceed

by Daily Legal Briefing
October 16, 2026
CVS Agrees to $315 Million Federal Settlement
Hot Topics

CVS Agrees to $315 Million Federal Settlement

by Daily Legal Briefing
October 16, 2026
Navigating Accident Claims in Modesto
Hot Topics

Navigating Accident Claims in Modesto

by Daily Legal Briefing
October 15, 2026
Next Post
Bigger Is Better In Biglaw

Bigger Is Better In Biglaw

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Browse by Category

  • Big Law
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Hot Topics
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
  • Small Law

About US

Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing.

Online coverage of breaking legal news and current law headlines from around the US. Top stories, videos, insight, and in-depth analysis.

Categories

  • Big Law
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Hot Topics
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
  • Small Law

Recent Updates

  • AI Legal Beat – Above the Law
  • Exciting Salary News For Biglaw Associates – See Also
  • Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Legal Work: Why It’s a Good Thing

© 2024 Daily Legal Briefing | Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Hot Topics
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Big Law
  • Small Law
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech

© 2024 Daily Legal Briefing | Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines

Not enough quota to unlock this post
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?