Warning: file_put_contents(/home/customer/www/dailylegalbriefing.com/public_html/wp-content/uploads/wpo/images/wpo_logo_small.png.webp): failed to open stream: Disk quota exceeded in /home/customer/www/dailylegalbriefing.com/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wp-optimize/vendor/rosell-dk/webp-convert/src/Convert/Converters/Gd.php on line 428
Judge imposes default judgment against former Littler Mendelson client for ‘subversive approach to discovery’ – Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing
Warning: unlink(/tmp/jnewslibrary-On4bXE.tmp): No such file or directory in /home/customer/www/dailylegalbriefing.com/public_html/wp-admin/includes/class-wp-filesystem-ftpext.php on line 142
Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing
  • Home
  • Hot Topics
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Big Law
  • Small Law
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing
No Result
View All Result
Home Hot Topics

Judge imposes default judgment against former Littler Mendelson client for ‘subversive approach to discovery’

Daily Legal Briefing by Daily Legal Briefing
November 23, 2021
in Hot Topics
0
Judge imposes default judgment against former Littler Mendelson client for ‘subversive approach to discovery’
5
SHARES
44
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


  1. Home
  2. Daily News
  3. Judge imposes default judgment against former…

Discovery

Judge imposes default judgment against former Littler Mendelson client for ‘subversive approach to discovery’

By Debra Cassens Weiss

November 22, 2021, 3:58 pm CST

money and gavel

Image from Shutterstock.

A federal judge in Mobile, Alabama, has imposed a default judgment against an Alabama steel mill once represented by Littler Mendelson because an attempt to hide payroll records “poisoned the entirety of this case.”

U.S. District Judge Jeffrey U. Beaverstock of the Southern District of Alabama ruled against Outokumpu Stainless USA on Nov. 18 in a lawsuit contending that it underpaid its employees in Calvert, Alabama, Law360 reports.

Beaverstock ruled for the plaintiffs, set a hearing on damages and said the plaintiffs are entitled to attorney fees as a result of the defendant’s conduct.

Federal law requires companies to keep payroll records for at least three years. The suit was filed in July 2018, yet it’s still unclear whether the company has complete records for 2015 to 2017, Beaverstock said.

When Outokumpu Stainless USA’s long-term employment law counsel was asked about the company’s retention policy for time and pay records, the lawyer said he didn’t know the answer.

Beaverstock also noted “inconsistency” over whether defense lawyers issued a litigation hold letter when the suit was filed in July 2018 and, if so, whether the company abided by it.

Littler Mendelson represented Outokumpu before the company hired new lawyers. Littler Mendelson previously agreed to pay at least $63,000 in legal fees to payroll company ADP after it claimed that a law firm partner lied about its compliance with a subpoena for payroll records by the plaintiffs. The partner no longer works for Littler Mendelson.

Beaverstock’s new opinion focuses on Outokumpu Stainless USA and its foot-dragging response to the plaintiffs’ requests for pay records, time records and incentive plan data.

“Since October 2018, defendant repeatedly represented to the magistrate judge and to plaintiffs that it would cooperate with discovery requests and comply with court orders,” Beaverstock wrote. “When defendant failed to cooperate or comply as represented, it offered a variety of excuses and then made more representations. Defendant then dishonored those representations. Then defendant commenced the whole sorry pattern over again.”

The pattern of misconduct “poisoned the entirety of this case,” Beaverstock said.

“At every turn, defendant delayed, obfuscated, violated or outright ignored the court’s orders, resulting in inefficiencies and confusion and ultimately delayed resolution of a case defendant represented
as one that would be fairly simply to resolve,” Beaverstock wrote.

Beaverstock said the company acted in bad faith when it violated numerous discovery orders and “when it attempted to foist responsibility for its failures on ADP.”

Information from ADP “demonstrates defendant’s fraudulent and manipulative tactics, constituting clear and convincing evidence of defendant’s bad faith,” Beaverstock wrote.

ADP “was not defendant’s only scapegoat,” Beaverstock said.

He pointed to the company’s complaint that its corporate representative and payroll specialist was out of her depth when responding to discovery requests. The same specialist was said to be a high-level manager, however, when it selected her to represent the company in a court hearing.

“The court finds defendant’s bad faith, stalling, inconsistent answers, falsehoods and all-around subversive approach to discovery undermined this case and the ability to decide it on the merits,” Beaverstock wrote.





Click to Read Original Article

Previous Post

Cravath is first to announce year-end associate bonuses, with more money for every class year

Next Post

Judge who searched litigant’s home for marital property gets censure and fine

Daily Legal Briefing

Daily Legal Briefing

Related Posts

Judge imposes default judgment against former Littler Mendelson client for ‘subversive approach to discovery’
Hot Topics

5th Circuit tells lawyer it is ‘often advisable to read the court’s orders,’ upholds $1,250 sanction

by Daily Legal Briefing
April 12, 2022
Law firm’s managing partner had a ‘fixation’ with employee surveillance, wiretap suit says
Hot Topics

Law firm’s managing partner had a ‘fixation’ with employee surveillance, wiretap suit says

by Daily Legal Briefing
April 12, 2022
Law school applicants are down, for now, for the first time since 2018
Hot Topics

Following a boost in 2021, national average score for February 2022 MBE drops

by Daily Legal Briefing
April 12, 2022
Google violated its ‘don’t be evil’ code when it fired 3 outspoken employees abiding by mandate, suit says
Hot Topics

Google’s ‘privileged’ email labeling, said to prevent lawsuit disclosure, was ‘eyebrow raising,’ judge says

by Daily Legal Briefing
April 11, 2022
New law allows this state’s judges to personally solicit campaign donations; ethics opinion adds wrinkle
Hot Topics

New law allows this state’s judges to personally solicit campaign donations; ethics opinion adds wrinkle

by Daily Legal Briefing
April 11, 2022
Next Post
Judge who searched litigant’s home for marital property gets censure and fine

Judge who searched litigant’s home for marital property gets censure and fine

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Premium Content

These Biglaw Salary Raises Were ‘Inevitable,’ So When Will The First Firm Match?

These Biglaw Salary Raises Were ‘Inevitable,’ So When Will The First Firm Match?

January 21, 2022
Johnny Depp Dating Lawyer Who Represented Him In Defamation Trial

Johnny Depp Dating Lawyer Who Represented Him In Defamation Trial

September 23, 2022
Am Law 100 Firm’s Co-Founding Partner Dies

For Women In The Legal Profession, It’s Enough With Too Little, Too Late

December 1, 2022

Browse by Category

  • Big Law
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Hot Topics
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
  • Small Law

About US

Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing.
Online coverage of breaking legal news and current law headlines from around the US. Top stories, videos, insight, and in-depth analysis.

Categories

  • Big Law
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Hot Topics
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
  • Small Law

Recent Updates

  • With Layoffs Lurking, Does Biglaw Pass The Vibe Check?
  • A Law Firm That’s A ‘Big Happy Family’ Is A Red Flag
  • Need To Go To Trial? The Best Trial Practices Out There

© 2021 Daily Legal Briefing | Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines

No Result
View All Result
  • Contact Us
  • Home

© 2021 Daily Legal Briefing | Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?

Warning: unlink(/tmp/jnewsfirstload-2j89wD.tmp): No such file or directory in /home/customer/www/dailylegalbriefing.com/public_html/wp-admin/includes/class-wp-filesystem-ftpext.php on line 142