Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing
  • Home
  • Hot Topics
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Big Law
  • Small Law
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing
No Result
View All Result
Home Hot Topics

Kentucky clerk who denied marriage licenses to same-sex couples can’t avoid liability for civil rights violations, judge rules

Daily Legal Briefing by Daily Legal Briefing
March 25, 2022
in Hot Topics
0
ABA opposes provisions in Florida’s ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill
4
SHARES
32
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


  1. Home
  2. Daily News
  3. Kentucky clerk who denied marriage licenses…

LGBTQ Legal Issues

Kentucky clerk who denied marriage licenses to same-sex couples can’t avoid liability for civil rights violations, judge rules

By Matt Reynolds

March 24, 2022, 8:52 am CDT

LGBTQ flag and gavel

Image from Shutterstock.

A federal judge in Kentucky has ruled that a former Rowan County, Kentucky, clerk who denied marriage licenses to same-sex couples cannot duck liability for violating their civil rights. But the court left it up to a jury to decide whether she should pay damages.

In 2015, after the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges enshrined the right of same-sex couples to get married, the clerk, Kim Davis, denied marriage licenses to several couples that came to her eastern Kentucky office.

Davis, who created an international furor when she turned the couples away, told them that she was denying them the licenses “under God’s authority,” according to the court’s ruling. Davis has said she objected to same-sex marriages.

In two cases before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, her attorneys claimed that she was shielded from liability as a government official and because her actions were permissible under Kentucky’s Religious Freedoms Restoration Act.

But in a ruling issued March 18, U.S. District Judge David L. Bunning of the Eastern District of Kentucky rejected Davis’ claim that she could avoid liability. He found that she had knowingly violated the couples’ constitutional rights, even after the Supreme Court protected them in Obergefell under the due process and equal protection clauses of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

The couples are seeking damages and legal fees. Bunning said the couples’ testimony in the two cases “at the very least creates a genuine issue of material fact as to whether they are entitled to damages” and said “punitive damages may very well be an available remedy.” But he said a jury must decide.

According to the ruling, plaintiff David Ermold had testified that every “time I think of my marriage, I have to think about Kim Davis and the experience, how we were humiliated and treated like less than human beings.”

Responding to the court’s ruling on Twitter, Ermold said the court’s ruling “feels like seven years of legal purgatory.”

“Judge Bunning finally ruled that Kim Davis intentionally violated our constitutional rights. Now, the question is will they hold her financially responsible for the insensitive and irrational legal mess that she created,” Ermold’s Twitter post states.

Liberty Counsel, a religious freedom organization headquartered in Maitland, Florida, represents Davis, who lost her bid for reelection in 2018, according to NPR. Its founder and chairman, Mat Staver, said the Supreme Court might ultimately decide the case.

“Kim Davis is entitled to protection to an accommodation based on her sincere religious belief,” Staver said in a press release.

The opinion noted that Davis, anticipating a Supreme Court decision, wrote to lawmakers to ask them to give her a religious exemption. But after the ruling, then-Democratic Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear had written to the clerk and explained that the decision was binding. The Rowan County attorney also advised her to follow the law.

“Any argument that Davis made a mistake, instead of a conscious decision to violate the law, is not only contrary to the record but also borders on incredulous,” Bunning wrote in the 22-page decision.

Bunning also found that Davis, who he jailed in 2015 for contempt of court, could not use religious freedom to duck responsibility for her conduct as the county clerk.

“Ultimately, this court’s determination is simple—Davis cannot use her own constitutional rights as a shield to violate the constitutional rights of others while performing her duties as an elected official,” he wrote.

See also:

ABAJournal.com: “5 years after landmark gay marriage ruling by SCOTUS, lawyer in the case says it’s ‘gone swimmingly well’”

ABAJournal.com: “Kim Davis may have circumvented court orders with modified marriage-license forms, filing says”

ABAJournal.com: “This group is defending Kentucky clerk and others who refuse to issue gay-marriage licenses”





Click to Read Original Article

Previous Post

SCOTUS will consider war powers in case of ailing veteran claiming employment discrimination

Next Post

Teen sentenced to 3 months by SCOTUS nominee Jackson felt ‘confusion and shock’ from images, his lawyer says

Daily Legal Briefing

Daily Legal Briefing

Related Posts

Judge imposes default judgment against former Littler Mendelson client for ‘subversive approach to discovery’
Hot Topics

5th Circuit tells lawyer it is ‘often advisable to read the court’s orders,’ upholds $1,250 sanction

by Daily Legal Briefing
April 12, 2022
Law firm’s managing partner had a ‘fixation’ with employee surveillance, wiretap suit says
Hot Topics

Law firm’s managing partner had a ‘fixation’ with employee surveillance, wiretap suit says

by Daily Legal Briefing
April 12, 2022
Law school applicants are down, for now, for the first time since 2018
Hot Topics

Following a boost in 2021, national average score for February 2022 MBE drops

by Daily Legal Briefing
April 12, 2022
Google violated its ‘don’t be evil’ code when it fired 3 outspoken employees abiding by mandate, suit says
Hot Topics

Google’s ‘privileged’ email labeling, said to prevent lawsuit disclosure, was ‘eyebrow raising,’ judge says

by Daily Legal Briefing
April 11, 2022
New law allows this state’s judges to personally solicit campaign donations; ethics opinion adds wrinkle
Hot Topics

New law allows this state’s judges to personally solicit campaign donations; ethics opinion adds wrinkle

by Daily Legal Briefing
April 11, 2022
Next Post
Teen sentenced to 3 months by SCOTUS nominee Jackson felt ‘confusion and shock’ from images, his lawyer says

Teen sentenced to 3 months by SCOTUS nominee Jackson felt 'confusion and shock' from images, his lawyer says

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Premium Content

Maryland Cops Can’t Seem To Understand Why Marijuana Legalization Means They Can’t Search Cars Just Because They Smell Marijuana

Maryland Cops Can’t Seem To Understand Why Marijuana Legalization Means They Can’t Search Cars Just Because They Smell Marijuana

June 2, 2023
Over 15% of Timeshare Owners End Up Regretting Their Purchase 

Over 15% of Timeshare Owners End Up Regretting Their Purchase 

February 12, 2022
Impromptu Labor Law Issue Spotter As Rutgers Law Goes On Strike

Impromptu Labor Law Issue Spotter As Rutgers Law Goes On Strike

April 10, 2023

Browse by Category

  • Big Law
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Hot Topics
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
  • Small Law

About US

Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing.
Online coverage of breaking legal news and current law headlines from around the US. Top stories, videos, insight, and in-depth analysis.

Categories

  • Big Law
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Hot Topics
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
  • Small Law

Recent Updates

  • Say Hello To The Nation’s First ABA-Approved Fully Online J.D. Program
  • Looking At Supply And Demand To Pinpoint Why Outside Counsel Rates Continue To Rise
  • Legal Career Growth: Why Continuous Engagement With Legal Recruiters Is Key

© 2021 Daily Legal Briefing | Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines

No Result
View All Result
  • Contact Us
  • Home

© 2021 Daily Legal Briefing | Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?