Warning: file_put_contents(/home/customer/www/dailylegalbriefing.com/public_html/wp-content/uploads/wpo/images/wpo_logo_small.png.webp): failed to open stream: Disk quota exceeded in /home/customer/www/dailylegalbriefing.com/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wp-optimize/vendor/rosell-dk/webp-convert/src/Convert/Converters/Gd.php on line 428
Law firm’s managing partner had a ‘fixation’ with employee surveillance, wiretap suit says – Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing
Warning: unlink(/tmp/jnewslibrary-RPJMCY.tmp): No such file or directory in /home/customer/www/dailylegalbriefing.com/public_html/wp-admin/includes/class-wp-filesystem-ftpext.php on line 142
Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing
  • Home
  • Hot Topics
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Big Law
  • Small Law
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing
No Result
View All Result
Home Hot Topics

Law firm’s managing partner had a ‘fixation’ with employee surveillance, wiretap suit says

Daily Legal Briefing by Daily Legal Briefing
April 12, 2022
in Hot Topics
0
Law firm’s managing partner had a ‘fixation’ with employee surveillance, wiretap suit says
4
SHARES
32
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


  1. Home
  2. Web First
  3. Law firm’s managing partner had a ‘fixation’…

Law Firms

Law firm’s managing partner had a ‘fixation’ with employee surveillance, wiretap suit says

By Debra Cassens Weiss

April 11, 2022, 11:53 am CDT

The managing partner of a Chicago law firm apparently monitored his employees with video cameras and a telephone system that allowed recording of phone calls, according to a lawsuit filed last week in federal court in Chicago.

The April 7 suit claims that the law firm’s managing partner, Edward “Eddie” Vrdolyak Jr., had a “fixation with audio and video surveillance.”

The suit cites “information and belief” that the firm’s offices in Chicago and Nashville, Tennessee, were equipped with a network of audio and surveillance cameras that Vrodyak monitored from several video screens in his office.

The suit plaintiff is Daniel Alholm, who opened a new Nashville, Tennessee, office for the personal injury law firm, the Vrdolyak Law Group, after being asked to do so in August 2017. Alholm said he resigned from the firm in January 2020 after asking Illinois and Tennessee lawyer regulators about his ethical duties following reports of surveillance.

Alholm’s suit alleges, based on information and belief, that:

• Vrdolyak directed an employee to call Alholm to tell him that he was watching the cameras for the Nashville office and could see that employees were spending too much time on their cellphones.

• Vrdolyak regularly instructed law firm employees to conduct “voicemail audits” in which they reviewed other employees’ voicemail messages. Unanswered voicemail messages were to be reported to Vrdolyak.

• Vrdolyak instructed an employee to “pull the tape” on a February 2019 conference call among Nashville employees to determine whether they were making disparaging remarks about him when the conference room phone was muted. Vrdolyak later told Alholm that the recording confirmed that employees made such remarks. But Vrdolyak later said he didn’t actually record the conference room conversation but had said he did to protect an employee who reported the disparaging comments.

• A law firm employee told Alholm in January 2020, after a new phone system was installed, that all phone calls made on office phones were being recorded and existed in a database on the computer. The employee said he could look up phone calls, click on them and listen to them.

The suit alleges violations of federal, Tennessee and Illinois laws regarding wiretapping and surveillance. Alholm also included a fraud claim based on alleged misrepresentations made when he was hired.

Alholm said he had expressed concerns during a hiring interview that the firm’s founder, Edward Vrdolyak Sr., had been disbarred and imprisoned. The elder Vrdolyak is a former Chicago alderman who pleaded guilty to mail and wire fraud in 2008 and tax evasion in 2019, according to a lawsuit footnote.

The younger Vrdolyak and two other partners assured Alholm that its employees were not involved in improper or illegal activity, the lawsuit says. During the interview, Alholm was told that he would be able to focus on mass tort litigation, that he would be provided with sufficient resources, and the firm had recovered more than $9 billion from its clients.

Those claims were untrue, the suit alleges.

After he was hired, Alholm was given 60 to 75 small cases that required him to put in long hours with little or no time to work on his mass tort caseload, the suit says. After he moved to Nashville, the law firm initially financed various marketing campaigns, but its resources turned out to be inadequate, the suit says. The law firm failed to pay bills for advertising, its office supply vendor stopped fulfilling orders, and its credit cards were frequently at their limit and often declined, the suit alleges.

The suit seeks class action status. Vrdolyak did not immediately respond to an ABA Journal message left with his office.

Hat tip to Bloomberg Law, which had coverage of the lawsuit, Alholm v. the Vrdolyak Law Group.





Click to Read Original Article

Previous Post

Following a boost in 2021, national average score for February 2022 MBE drops

Next Post

5th Circuit tells lawyer it is ‘often advisable to read the court’s orders,’ upholds $1,250 sanction

Daily Legal Briefing

Daily Legal Briefing

Related Posts

Judge imposes default judgment against former Littler Mendelson client for ‘subversive approach to discovery’
Hot Topics

5th Circuit tells lawyer it is ‘often advisable to read the court’s orders,’ upholds $1,250 sanction

by Daily Legal Briefing
April 12, 2022
Law school applicants are down, for now, for the first time since 2018
Hot Topics

Following a boost in 2021, national average score for February 2022 MBE drops

by Daily Legal Briefing
April 12, 2022
Google violated its ‘don’t be evil’ code when it fired 3 outspoken employees abiding by mandate, suit says
Hot Topics

Google’s ‘privileged’ email labeling, said to prevent lawsuit disclosure, was ‘eyebrow raising,’ judge says

by Daily Legal Briefing
April 11, 2022
New law allows this state’s judges to personally solicit campaign donations; ethics opinion adds wrinkle
Hot Topics

New law allows this state’s judges to personally solicit campaign donations; ethics opinion adds wrinkle

by Daily Legal Briefing
April 11, 2022
Kirkland tops $6B in revenue; another Pop-Tarts suit is tossed
Hot Topics

Kirkland tops $6B in revenue; another Pop-Tarts suit is tossed

by Daily Legal Briefing
April 9, 2022
Next Post
Judge imposes default judgment against former Littler Mendelson client for ‘subversive approach to discovery’

5th Circuit tells lawyer it is 'often advisable to read the court's orders,' upholds $1,250 sanction

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Premium Content

5 Reasons You Need a Bill of Sale When Selling Your Boat

5 Reasons You Need a Bill of Sale When Selling Your Boat

May 24, 2022
How You Can Put SEO To Work For Your Firm

A Plaintiffs Firm’s Guide To Finding And Converting Clients Online

August 15, 2022
Jonathan Turley Earns Withering Rebuke From Preet Bharara

Jonathan Turley Earns Withering Rebuke From Preet Bharara

October 25, 2022

Browse by Category

  • Big Law
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Hot Topics
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
  • Small Law

About US

Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing.
Online coverage of breaking legal news and current law headlines from around the US. Top stories, videos, insight, and in-depth analysis.

Categories

  • Big Law
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Hot Topics
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
  • Small Law

Recent Updates

  • With Layoffs Lurking, Does Biglaw Pass The Vibe Check?
  • A Law Firm That’s A ‘Big Happy Family’ Is A Red Flag
  • Need To Go To Trial? The Best Trial Practices Out There

© 2021 Daily Legal Briefing | Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines

No Result
View All Result
  • Contact Us
  • Home

© 2021 Daily Legal Briefing | Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?

Warning: unlink(/tmp/jnewsfirstload-ehQAj5.tmp): No such file or directory in /home/customer/www/dailylegalbriefing.com/public_html/wp-admin/includes/class-wp-filesystem-ftpext.php on line 142