Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing
  • Home
  • Hot Topics
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Big Law
  • Small Law
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing
No Result
View All Result
Home Law School

Stanford Law Student Proves That Fair Play Doesn’t Really Apply To The Police

Daily Legal Briefing by Daily Legal Briefing
January 19, 2023
in Law School
0
Stanford Law Student Proves That Fair Play Doesn’t Really Apply To The Police
4
SHARES
32
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


Court of Law and Justice Trial Stand: Portrait of Black Policeman Witness Giving Testimony to Judge, Jury. African American Officer Providing Evidence. Law Enforcement Agent in Courthouse.For many law students, doing journal is just the socially acceptable form of hazing you have to endure if you want your application to stand out in that Biglaw or clerkship application pile. You share a co-op space with your sleep deprived peers, seriously consider the efficacy of injecting caffeine, and strap in for the grunt work of editing and finding citations for the bombardment of papers teachers from other schools send to you.

Some people get a hell lot more out of the experience — take Stanford Law student James Stone for example:

He had been reading about communities nationwide moving toward making police misconduct records more accessible to the public. With his mind on the rules of evidence, including the nuanced situations where certain prior bad acts of defendants are admissible in criminal trials, he started thinking about the admissibility standards around past instances of misconduct by police officers who are sued in civil cases for excessive force.

“I wondered if the past-act admissibility standards in these trials are the same for the accused police officers as they are for the plaintiffs bringing those cases,” said Stone.

Prior to the statistical analysis, many people’s answer would have been no — see:

Prosecutors: Violent misconduct doesn’t affect police credibility.

Also prosecutors: We will always introduce defendants’ past criminal convictions as evidence at trial to attack their credibility

— Carissa Byrne Hessick (@CBHessick) October 21, 2021

The amazing thing is that among the evidence the police are bringing against the whistleblower, is that he committed misconduct in the past by NOT blowing the whistle in a previous incident.

Catch 22: Cop Edition.

— Dominic Tarason (@DominicTarason) November 14, 2021

Why does killer Derek Chauvin’s idiot lawyer get to use George Floyd’s past as an excuse for him being murdered but no one brings up the 18 incidents and complaints of police misconduct on Chauvin’s abysmal record?

— Ricky Davila (@TheRickyDavila) April 5, 2021


That said, we are a data driven culture. And while
mere words from an officer with a documented history of lying may be enough to condemn any guy or gal off the street, you’ve really gotta prove your case when you speak out against the men in blue. James did just that.

A year of research and 17,000 words later, he has the answer to his question: no. The standards are not the same…Stone critiques how courts’ interpretations of the long-held “objective reasonableness” standard, paired with Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, cause judges to hold certain officer misconduct evidence irrelevant and therefore inadmissible at trial. Conversely, as he analyzes, many judges admit evidence of a plaintiff-victim’s past drug use, criminal activity, encounters with police, and gang affiliation under what he argues are strained relevance arguments. He undertakes the same analysis to rules around use of past acts to impeach the testimony of plaintiffs and accused officers.

Call me crazy, but I think this data shows that what we are calling police brutality isn’t merely just a policing issue. Are the police involved? Of course, they’re the ones swinging the batons or jumping handcuffed people and the like — but they aren’t doing so unsupported. Judges also play a role in determining what information is allowed to be admitted as evidence. As important as it is for judges to avoid even the appearance of impartiality — that is of course why Michigan Supreme Court Justice Richard Bernstein took the initiative to tell Justice Bolden how to do her job and not hire Pete Martel as a clerk, he voiced the concern that it may send a hostile message to police facing trial. I wonder how often judge impartiality, via differing evidentiary standards, cuts across the attempts at impartiality and is just straight up pro-cop? I have no reason to accuse Justice Bernstein of doing this — it would be baseless and is not my intention. That said, to anyone thinking about further developing James statistical analysis, Michigan is as good a state as any other to start. The invitation extends outside of law professors trying to hit tenure as well! Part of what makes this story so interesting is that Stone’s research was chosen by a journal without his being a professor!

“I very quickly realized that most of the journals won’t even look at submissions from law students, but some were somewhat ambiguous in their parameters. For example, Washington University School of Law said it would consider publishing pieces around 15,000 words—so-called “commentaries”—from ‘members of the legal academy, bench and bar,’” Stone said. “So I said to myself, ‘hey, maybe I’m in ‘the academy?’ After they extended an offer to publish the article, I spent a few weeks wondering if they even realized I was a student.

My hope is that my minting school, trailblazers that they are, saw the significance of Stone’s research and published it even though they knew he was a student. That said, I’ve seen the long hours WashU students spend in those journal rooms. Late night burning the midnight oil, James Stone does sound defacto professorial. Either way, shouts out to Stanford and WashU!

Stanford Law Student Calls Out Evidentiary Double Standards in Cases Accusing Police of Excessive Force [Law.Stanford.Edu]


Chris Williams became a social media manager and assistant editor for Above the Law in June 2021. Prior to joining the staff, he moonlighted as a minor Memelord™ in the Facebook group Law School Memes for Edgy T14s.  He endured Missouri long enough to graduate from Washington University in St. Louis School of Law. He is a former boatbuilder who cannot swim, a published author on critical race theory, philosophy, and humor, and has a love for cycling that occasionally annoys his peers. You can reach him by email at cwilliams@abovethelaw.com and by tweet at @WritesForRent.





Click to Read Original Article

Previous Post

Are You Really Sorry? – Above the LawAbove the Law

Next Post

ChatGPT: What It Is And Why It Matters To Lawyers

Daily Legal Briefing

Daily Legal Briefing

The latest breaking legal news from across World all in one place.

Related Posts

Cruel And Unusual: Judge Sentences Defendant To Go To Law School
Law School

Cruel And Unusual: Judge Sentences Defendant To Go To Law School

by Daily Legal Briefing
February 4, 2023
Law Schools With The Most Competitive Students v. Law Schools With The Best Quality Of Life (2023)
Law School

Law Schools With The Most Competitive Students v. Law Schools With The Best Quality Of Life (2023)

by Daily Legal Briefing
February 3, 2023
Former Law School Dean Accused Of Theft Now Charged With Sex Crime With Minor
Law School

Former Law School Dean Accused Of Theft Now Charged With Sex Crime With Minor

by Daily Legal Briefing
February 3, 2023
The Law Schools With The Most Conservative And Liberal Students (2023)
Law School

The Law Schools With The Most Conservative And Liberal Students (2023)

by Daily Legal Briefing
February 3, 2023
Start Hitting Yourself: Chemerinsky Considers The Interesting Question Of When A State Can Sue The State
Law School

Start Hitting Yourself: Chemerinsky Considers The Interesting Question Of When A State Can Sue The State

by Daily Legal Briefing
February 2, 2023
Next Post
ChatGPT: What It Is And Why It Matters To Lawyers

ChatGPT: What It Is And Why It Matters To Lawyers

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Premium Content

What Do You Need To Know When It Comes To NFTs And The Law?

What Do You Need To Know When It Comes To NFTs And The Law?

July 19, 2022
Why Practice Management Software Is Now Table Stakes For Law Firms

Why Practice Management Software Is Now Table Stakes For Law Firms

February 18, 2022
New program guarantees diverse students admission to law school

Overall, law schools see increase in 1Ls and decrease in non-JD students

December 16, 2021

Browse by Category

  • Big Law
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Hot Topics
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
  • Small Law

About US

Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing.
Online coverage of breaking legal news and current law headlines from around the US. Top stories, videos, insight, and in-depth analysis.

Categories

  • Big Law
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Hot Topics
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
  • Small Law

Recent Updates

  • Baker McKenzie Investigating Racism Claims; Partner Steps Away From Leadership Role
  • This Biglaw Firm Has The Urge To Merge, But Can’t Find A Willing Partner
  • Why The Legal Work Experience Is Broken And How You Can Do Better

© 2021 Daily Legal Briefing | Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines

No Result
View All Result
  • Contact Us
  • Home

© 2021 Daily Legal Briefing | Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?