Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing
  • Home
  • Hot Topics
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Big Law
  • Small Law
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing
No Result
View All Result
Home Hot Topics

Supreme Court allows abortion providers to sue over Texas law but keeps law intact for now

Daily Legal Briefing by Daily Legal Briefing
December 10, 2021
in Hot Topics
0
Supreme Court appears ready to uphold ban on abortions after 15 weeks
4
SHARES
32
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


  1. Home
  2. Daily News
  3. Supreme Court allows abortion providers to…

U.S. Supreme Court

Supreme Court allows abortion providers to sue over Texas law but keeps law intact for now

By Debra Cassens Weiss

December 10, 2021, 9:30 am CST

shutterstock_Abortion Restriction paper, gavel and stethoscop

Images from Shutterstock.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Friday that abortion providers can sue over a Texas abortion law that authorizes private parties to sue anyone who aids an abortion performed after about six weeks of pregnancy.

The court said abortion providers could sue state officials with authority over medical licenses but not other officials. The majority opinion did not address whether the Texas law is constitutional and allowed the law to remain in effect.

The high court dismissed a separate challenge filed by the U.S. government as “improvidently granted.”

Eight justices agreed that the abortion providers could sue at least some state officials. Justice Clarence Thomas said he did not think that the abortion providers could sue any of the defendants.

Three liberal justices, along with Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., said the Texas law was unconstitutional.

The law, known as SB 8, prevents abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected, typically at about six weeks of pregnancy. The law relies on the general public, rather than the state, for enforcement. It authorizes lawsuits by private parties who may seek $10,000 in damages against anyone who aids an abortion.

Justice Neil M. Gorsuch wrote the opinion for the court, joined in full by Justices Samuel A. Alito Jr., Brett M. Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.

Thomas joined part of Gorsuch’s opinion, while the other members of the court partly concurred in the judgment.

Gorsuch noted that the Supreme Court granted review based on a petition for certiorari before judgment, and the Supreme Court stands in the shoes of the federal appeals court in such cases.

“In this preliminary posture, the ultimate merits question—whether SB 8 is consistent with the federal Constitution—is not before the court,” Gorsuch wrote. “Nor is the wisdom of SB 8 as a matter of public policy.”

Gorsuch said there are several paths still available to challenge the law. Suits can be brought in state court, and those sued can pursue constitutional arguments in their defense.

Gorsuch said 14 state court suits have already been filed, and abortion providers prevailed on some of their claims in a judge’s summary judgment ruling last night.

Roberts concurred in the judgment in part and dissented in part in an opinion joined by Justices Stephen G. Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.

Roberts said he would have allowed suit against additional defendants, including the state attorney general, who also has authority to seek a penalty for physicians who violate the law. Roberts also would have allowed suit against a court clerk who dockets lawsuits.

Roberts said Texas had “employed an array of stratagems designed to shield its unconstitutional law from judicial review.”

“The clear purpose and actual effect of SB 8 has been to nullify this court’s rulings,” he wrote. “If the legislatures of the several states may, at will, annul the judgments of the courts of the United States, and destroy the rights acquired under those judgments, the Constitution itself becomes a solemn mockery,” he said, using the words of an 1809 decision.

“The nature of the federal right infringed does not matter; it is the role of the Supreme Court in our constitutional system that is at stake.”

Sotomayor wrote a separate partial concurrence and dissent, joined by Breyer and Kagan.

She said the Texas law has had a “near total” chilling effect, depriving women of the opportunity to seek abortions in their home state after six weeks of pregnancy.

“The court should have put an end to this madness months ago,” Sotomayor wrote.

The case filed by the abortion providers is Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson. The case filed by the federal government is United States v. Texas.

Still pending before the court is Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a challenge to a Missisippi abortion law that bans abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy.

Hat tip to SCOTUSblog, which had breaking news of the ruling. Other publications with coverage include the New York Times, CNN and the Washington Post.

See also:

ABAJournal.com: “Chemerinsky: Ruling in abortion cases will greatly affect women’s lives but won’t end controversy”

ABAJournal.com: “Supreme Court will hear Texas abortion case on expedited basis but refuses again to block the law”

ABAJournal.com: “ABA urges Supreme Court to rule US can sue to block unconstitutional Texas abortion law”

ABAJournal.com: “SCOTUS formally rejects request to block Texas abortion ban”

ABAJournal.com: “Supreme Court appears ready to uphold ban on abortions after 15 weeks”





Click to Read Original Article

Previous Post

The First Magic Circle Firm To Make Bonuses Magically Appear For Associates

Next Post

DC Circuit rejects Trump’s bid to keep presidential records from House committee probing Capitol riot

Daily Legal Briefing

Daily Legal Briefing

Related Posts

Judge imposes default judgment against former Littler Mendelson client for ‘subversive approach to discovery’
Hot Topics

5th Circuit tells lawyer it is ‘often advisable to read the court’s orders,’ upholds $1,250 sanction

by Daily Legal Briefing
April 12, 2022
Law firm’s managing partner had a ‘fixation’ with employee surveillance, wiretap suit says
Hot Topics

Law firm’s managing partner had a ‘fixation’ with employee surveillance, wiretap suit says

by Daily Legal Briefing
April 12, 2022
Law school applicants are down, for now, for the first time since 2018
Hot Topics

Following a boost in 2021, national average score for February 2022 MBE drops

by Daily Legal Briefing
April 12, 2022
Google violated its ‘don’t be evil’ code when it fired 3 outspoken employees abiding by mandate, suit says
Hot Topics

Google’s ‘privileged’ email labeling, said to prevent lawsuit disclosure, was ‘eyebrow raising,’ judge says

by Daily Legal Briefing
April 11, 2022
New law allows this state’s judges to personally solicit campaign donations; ethics opinion adds wrinkle
Hot Topics

New law allows this state’s judges to personally solicit campaign donations; ethics opinion adds wrinkle

by Daily Legal Briefing
April 11, 2022
Next Post
DC Circuit rejects Trump’s bid to keep presidential records from House committee probing Capitol riot

DC Circuit rejects Trump's bid to keep presidential records from House committee probing Capitol riot

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Premium Content

5 Takeaways From The 2022 Law School Rankings

5 Takeaways From The 2022 Law School Rankings

June 10, 2022
Ruling in abortion cases will greatly affect women’s lives but won’t end controversy

SCOTUS could make significant ruling on EPA’s authority to fight climate change—or not

March 4, 2022
Let’s Rank The Best Law Schools Since They Don’t Want U.S. News To Do It

One More Upset In Our Non-Scientific Law School Ranking

March 22, 2023

Browse by Category

  • Big Law
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Hot Topics
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
  • Small Law

About US

Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing.
Online coverage of breaking legal news and current law headlines from around the US. Top stories, videos, insight, and in-depth analysis.

Categories

  • Big Law
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Hot Topics
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
  • Small Law

Recent Updates

  • Do You Believe The AI Hype? 
  • How the Vacation Rental Industry is Evolving in 2023 
  • Local SEO: 7 Tips to Lift Up Your Google Business Rankings

© 2021 Daily Legal Briefing | Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines

No Result
View All Result
  • Contact Us
  • Home

© 2021 Daily Legal Briefing | Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?