Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing
  • Home
  • Hot Topics
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Big Law
  • Small Law
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing
No Result
View All Result
Home Big Law

Twitter v. Musk: Will The Spat About Spam Be Settled In Court?

Daily Legal Briefing by Daily Legal Briefing
July 14, 2022
in Big Law
0
Twitter v. Musk: Will The Spat About Spam Be Settled In Court?
4
SHARES
32
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


elon musk smokingAs many predicted, Elon Musk backed out of his attempt to acquire Twitter after a public spat about fake and spam bots in its userbase. In response, Twitter sued Musk, demanding specific performance to force Musk to purchase Twitter for $44 billion. Why are fake accounts such an issue for Musk? And what is this lawsuit going to accomplish?

For some, this turn of events is strange considering that when all of this began, Twitter’s board of directors and many of their notable users did not want Musk to purchase the company. The board implemented a poison pill which would have made it extremely costly for Musk to purchase a majority share. Several prominent users deleted their Twitter accounts in response and others threatened to do the same if the purchase was completed.

Twitter, in its quarterly SEC filings claims that less than 5% of its users are spam or fake accounts. But this calculation is not based on any industry standard, if one exists. The calculation is done through their own internal audits using automated and manual reviews. It acknowledges that independent audits from third parties and using competitors’ methods could result in a different (and possibly higher) percentage.

Musk’s reason for terminating the purchase was due to Twitter’s failure to provide information — to his satisfaction — on fake and spam accounts. He wanted to verify Twitter’s claim that less than 5% of its users were fake. He also claimed that several key employees were fired without his permission, which was in violation of the merger agreement.

In its complaint, Twitter stated that it provided all of the information that Musk requested, even allowing him to have access to the “firehose,” which is a live feed of tweets, likes, and retweets. Twitter also argues that Musk cannot terminate the agreement because he has violated the merger agreement by making disparaging tweets about the company during negotiations. These tweets and Musk’s change of heart has lowered Twitter’s stock value and hurt its reputation.

Fake and spam accounts can be problematic. They inflate the number of users, which might upset advertisers who want to reach a certain number of monetizable active daily users. Similarly, these accounts could make certain people appear more popular and influential than they actually are by inflating their follower count. Worst of all, fake accounts can be used to spread lies and harass other users. These accounts can send automated tweets promoting Viagra or the latest Ponzicoin. If these accounts go unchecked, users might switch to another platform like TikTok, Twitch, or Truth Social. Advertisers will take their money elsewhere.

On the other hand, spam and fake accounts can be used for good. Some people use alter ego accounts to disclose sensitive and confidential information in the public interest. Automated accounts can also be useful for announcing stock prices and sales, for those who want such information.

As this lawsuit proceeds, Musk and his legal team will again demand the information he wanted during the discovery process. Since both sides disagree about the level of cooperation, the judge is likely to pay close attention to the reasonableness and specificity of Musk’s demands and whether Twitter is willing to provide the information requested.

Assuming Twitter provides Musk with the information he requested regarding fake and spam accounts, Musk will likely use his own methodology and metrics to determine whether Twitter’s 5% claim is correct. If Musk’s findings show a higher number of fake accounts, will the court accept his conclusion and allow him to walk away from the deal? Keep in mind that neither of the parties has acknowledged an industry standard for determining the number of spam accounts. There may be an issue as to what a fake or spam account is.

Also, the lawsuit may provide information on why Musk really wants to buy Twitter. Or whether he wanted to buy it at all. There is talk that this offer was a ploy by Musk to sell his Tesla stock at its peak without spooking investors and possibly lowering the value of outstanding Tesla stock. Or did he just want to reinstate the accounts of former president Donald Trump and the Babylon Bee?

This lawsuit raises some interesting questions. But it seems like as the case progresses, it seems less likely that we will get answers. Instead, there will be more negative press about both Musk and Twitter. So it might be in everyone’s best interest to settle this lawsuit sooner than later.


Steven Chung is a tax attorney in Los Angeles, California. He helps people with basic tax planning and resolve tax disputes. He is also sympathetic to people with large student loans. He can be reached via email at stevenchungatl@gmail.com. Or you can connect with him on Twitter (@stevenchung) and connect with him on LinkedIn.





Click to Read Original Article

Previous Post

Streamline Your Legal Billing Process

Next Post

Twitter Complaint Demonstrates That Every Lawyer, Everywhere, Always Is Smarter Than Elon Musk

Daily Legal Briefing

Daily Legal Briefing

The latest breaking legal news from across World all in one place.

Related Posts

Biglaw Firms With Tech-Centric Clients May Soon Face Financial Difficulties
Big Law

The Biglaw Firm With The Largest Decline In Gross Revenue

by Daily Legal Briefing
June 3, 2023
Biglaw Probably Won’t Be Hemorrhaging Lawyers Via Layoffs Anytime Soon
Big Law

Am Law 200 Firm Announces Employee Cuts, Citing ‘Challenging Economic Environment’

by Daily Legal Briefing
June 2, 2023
Mastering Lateral Hiring Interviews For Your Legal Career: Essential Strategies and Insights
Big Law

Mastering Lateral Hiring Interviews For Your Legal Career: Essential Strategies and Insights

by Daily Legal Briefing
June 2, 2023
Elite Law Firms Recognized As Some Of The Best For Women & Diversity (2023)
Big Law

Elite Law Firms Recognized As Some Of The Best For Women & Diversity (2023)

by Daily Legal Briefing
June 2, 2023
Biglaw Firms Are Continuing To Grow Amid Dropping Demand Because Associates Aren’t Quitting
Big Law

Biglaw Firms Are Continuing To Grow Amid Dropping Demand Because Associates Aren’t Quitting

by Daily Legal Briefing
June 2, 2023
Next Post
Elon Musk Takes Time Out From Failing To Buy Twitter To Fail To Build His Own Law Firm

Twitter Complaint Demonstrates That Every Lawyer, Everywhere, Always Is Smarter Than Elon Musk

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Premium Content

4 Reasons People Filing Taxes in Denver May Need a Lawyer

How Much Money Does a Small Business Need to Pay in Taxes in Arlington?

February 9, 2023
Biglaw Firms Tamp Down On Leasing Activity Amid Fears Of Recession

Biglaw Firms Level Up On Leasing Activity, Seeing Best First Quarter Ever

May 17, 2023
Cravath Announces Major Change To Partnership Model

Cravath Announces Major Change To Partnership Model

December 7, 2021

Browse by Category

  • Big Law
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Hot Topics
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
  • Small Law

About US

Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines | Daily Legal Briefing.
Online coverage of breaking legal news and current law headlines from around the US. Top stories, videos, insight, and in-depth analysis.

Categories

  • Big Law
  • Breaking
  • Business
  • Hot Topics
  • Law School
  • Legal Tech
  • Small Law

Recent Updates

  • Lawyers Who Used ChatGPT To Fake Opinions Are In Real Trouble
  • Clients Should Try Not To Contact Lawyers During Odd Hours
  • Jonathan Turley Rewrites Constitution To Include ‘Congressional Backsies’ Clause

© 2021 Daily Legal Briefing | Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines

No Result
View All Result
  • Contact Us
  • Home

© 2021 Daily Legal Briefing | Breaking Legal News & Current Law Headlines

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?