Rachel Juarez, one of the judges on the syndicated court show Hot Bench, joins me to trace her path from Quinn Emanuel to a solo family law practice to national television, and to explain what it actually takes to run an unscripted courtroom show, including the AI-fueled lawsuits she’s starting to see on set.
Key Takeaways:
* Rachel Juarez loved Biglaw. She left Quinn Emanuel not because of the culture but for a lifestyle change after having her first child, and says she’d go back if she ever returned to that kind of practice.
* Family law was one of the few practice areas where Juarez could realistically source her own clients as a new solo attorney, since her Biglaw litigation clients weren’t hers to take with her.
* Running even a small firm meant learning an entirely new skill set overnight: billing software, malpractice insurance, IT, and bar compliance, none of which law school teaches.
* Juarez got her Hot Bench audition through a client’s connection while she was four to five weeks postpartum, and had six days to accept the job once it was offered.
* The judge’s role is more nuanced than an advocate’s: Juarez describes learning to stop “winning” admissions and instead check whether a litigant understood what they’d just conceded.
* Litigants are increasingly showing up with AI-generated legal theories, including one who sued because ChatGPT told her, after a leading question, that she was being scammed.
Kathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, host of The Jabot podcast, and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter @Kathryn1 or Bluesky @Kathryn1
